There might be a dozen reasons why NOT water flow calorimetry, but the
big thing here is, why bother?
They get a torrent of heat, /easily/ shown by IR to be far, far more
than any that accepted science can explain away, and you want that last
decimal place?
The question that was answered is, /is it real/? The answer is binary,
two-state, accuracy is not a factor.
But I think what you are really saying is that somehow hot water trumps
IR, in the gut perhaps. It's not separated from common sense basement
engineering by several exponential equations. And I think you are right
in this, at least for a portion of the (persuadable) critics.
Ol' Bab
On 5/20/2013 12:04 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
But the main issue - why they did not perform water flow calorimetry?
That is a major question that needs to be answered after all of these
months. Instead of removing doubts, which they could have done with
water flow - they merely added more doubts.
