The spark plugs produce potassium and hydrogen nanoparticles. A picture of the DGT micro particles can be found in Kim's presentation will show the nanowires.
The nanowires will crack the H2 into H. See Hot Electrons Do the Impossible - Plasmon-Induced Dissociation of H2 http://www.princeton.edu/mae/people/faculty/carter/EAC-267.pdf I don't know for sure, but your Curie temperature might be way to high. You should check. On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]>wrote: > Sorry Axil, I don't suspend my particles in a separate matrix as does > Defkalion. My technique is more like that of Rossi. > > The spark plugs are not required to see the LENR. Neither Rossi's original > eCat nor his latest HotCats have any sparkplugs or RF excitation. Reports > suggest that they are not required for the effect. I do not believe DGT's > sparkplugs are causing plasma effects that extend into the powder. The mean > free path of monatomic H in high pressure H2 is only microns. DGT does not > appear to apply enough power to the sparkplugs to totally ionize the H2 > contents. There could be excitation of their reactor as an RF cavity, but > it is not strongly excited. The sparkplug could also be operating as an > acoustic transducer driving an acoustic resonance in DGT's reactor. It will > be important for DGT to determine what about their sparks is causing the > enhanced LENR so that they can maximize the benefits. If it is RF cavity > resonance, then there is no need for the spark - just drive with RF at the > right frequency matched into the cavity. > > Do you know this about the nanowires from your own experiments? I think > this is bunk. The nanowires would melt pretty quickly at the temperatures > we are talking about and particularly with the local heating at the NAE. I > noted in my paper that there are Ni dendrites on my powder, but I don't > believe they are the NAEs. At best, they may be useful for H2 cracking. It > was just noted. > > What do you mean, "surrounded by spark production"? Again, is this a > report of your first hand experience? > > Please stop saying things as if they are certain unless you have first > hand evidence that they are. > > Bob > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From a very quick look, I do not see nanowires on the surface of the >> particles. >> >> I do not see the suspension of the particles on a matrix to expose all >> the particle surface areas to the clusters produced by the spark plug(s). >> >> The particles should be maximum of 5 microns in diameter with 2 microns >> of nanowire covering. The majority of the particles should be 5 microns >> total including the nanowire covering. >> >> The particles should be surrounded by spark production. >> >> Can these changes be made? >> >> >
