On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com>wrote:
> it seems National instruments asked such doublinded test in 2012, > according to the conference of Concezz in Rome (and Brussels)... > Do you have any better links, I find this test interesting a.t.m. Of cause when the risk of fraud and ugly gaming is present, a correct test is more delicate. The nice thing with a old time LENR test is that the researchers can be assumed to not perform a fraud. It's possible to skip the suggested skeptic group and just make sure the testers are honest about not peeking the kind of water. Actually believing in LENR+ is much easier if LENR is proven interesting. So it would certainly help attracting capital and humans for LENR+ Regards Stefan
