I think what Axil is saying is that LeClair is claiming research replication as "beneficial use" and must, therefore, be licensed by the patent owner.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Mark Gibbs <mgi...@gibbs.com> wrote: > But that doesn't answer the question: If it only costs $250 to replicate > LeClair's experiment why hasn't it been done? > > [m] > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> LeClair has patented the whole process including replication. That is >> what he states, I don't know if this statement holds water. He says that >> replication is extremely dangerous and he does not want to see anybody go >> through what he when through.. >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Mark Gibbs <mgi...@gibbs.com> wrote: >> >>> Really? Is LeClair's experiment that easily replicated? If it can be >>> done for $250 why has no one else done it? >>> >>> [m] >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> If these experimenters wanted to produce gammas, they only need to >>>> replicate the LeClair cavitation reactor. $250 dollars will do it. A year >>>> in the hospital from radiation exposure should be enough to rid them of >>>> their obsession from gamma radiation. They may also get a dose of neutrons >>>> and alpha particles. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> After that, they will be where LeClair is now, regarded as a madman by >>>> all and sundry. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Anyways, the reality is (remember that? reality?) that MFMP is >>>>> constrained by resources just like everyone else is in the physical real >>>>> world. >>>>> >>>>> If you have experiments that you would like to see done and >>>>> tools/equipment/materials you can give them, I am pretty sure they'd be >>>>> all >>>>> over that. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
