Experimentation with gold nano-particles show LENR+ reaction with 100% repeatability.
These simple, straight forward, and uncomplicated experiments show that the Nanoplasmonic mechanism is unambiguously capable of producing nuclear reactions. I consider that Nanoplasmonics is the quintessential expression of the electrochemists art, a science conceived and brought into being by progenitor and paterfamilias of LENR, Martin Fleischmann himself back in 1974. An experiment not related to the E-Cat shows how light under the mediation of nanoparticles (provides topological order of the spin net liquid) can produce a nuclear reaction. Laser light alone does not produce the nuclear effect. http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0911/0911.5495.pdf *Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation of Au nanoparticles in the aqueous solution of Uranium salt* It is clearly shown that Neutrons are not required to initiate fission. Abstract Laser exposure of suspension of either gold or palladium nanoparticles in aqueous solutions of UO2Cl2 of natural isotope abundance was experimentally studied. Picosecond Nd:YAG lasers at peak power of 1011 -1013 W/cm2 at the wavelength of 1.06 – 0.355 m were used as well as a visible-range Cu vapor laser at peak power of 1010 W/cm2. The composition of colloidal solutions before and after laser exposure was analyzed using atomic absorption and gamma spectroscopy in 0.06 – 1 MeV range of photon energy. A real-time gamma-spectroscopy was used to characterize the kinetics of nuclear reactions during laser exposure. It was found that laser exposure initiated nuclear reactions involving both 238U and 235U nuclei via different channels in H2O and D2O. The influence of saturation of both the liquid and nanoparticles by gaseous H2 and D2 on the kinetics of nuclear transformations was found. Possible mechanisms of observed processes are discussed. Here is another paper: I have referenced papers here to show how the nanoplasmonic mechanism can change the half-life of U232 from 69 years to 6 microseconds. It also causes thorium to fission. See references: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CC4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fpdf%2F1112.6276&ei=nI6UUeG1Fq-N0QGypIAg&usg=AFQjCNFB59F1wkDv-NzeYg5TpnyZV1kpKQ&sig2=fhdWJ_enNKlLA4HboFBTUA&bvm=bv.46471029,d.dmQ I have been looking for a theory that supports the Nanoplasmonic underpinnings of LENR. Composite fermions look good so far. For one thing, LENR is rooted in topology. These experiments are conclusive for me. These Nanoplasmonic experiments with uranium can be done inexpensively, why are they not replicated? On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote: > *The major reaction in the Ni/H reaction is the fission reaction. You are > wallowing in a morass of invalid information. Learn about the fractional > quantum hall effect to get onto the right track.* > > Actually Axil, we don't know what it is. You're entitled to your > interpretation but that's all it is. Not enough data exists to support your > assertions no matter how well thought out they are. > > As to John Franks' antagonistic demands for a "definitive experiment" > (presumably for evidence of excess heat), those demands had been met many > times already by 1994 (McKubre, Storms, Oriani, Huggins, Arata, Bockris, > etc.). If he had cared to look back on the history of the field + the > archived technical papers he could have answered his own questions before > coming in here for the most basic of information. > > Faraday efficiency has to do with recombination. Recombination has been > ruled out many times over in LENR experiments. Mr. Franks, do you honestly > think highly trained electrochemists did not understand > that rudimentary recombination might be a factor worth ruling out early on? > > Even though progress has been made, we still don't know what the mechanism > is. So what? Experiment is king in science, and it sometimes takes a > generation or more to discover what the exact mechanism for a new > phenomenon is. Discounting a discovery for the reason that it does not fit > into current theory totally flips scientific protocol on its head and is an > amateurish understanding of scientific method at best. We are dealing with > a messy, complex, chemical system, not highly controllable 2 body nuclear > interactions in a vacuum like most physicists are used to. Unreasonable > demands for high repeatability make no sense for these types of complex, > highly non-linear systems, especially in the early stages of development. > Scientific history is full of such stubbornly unrepeatable cases that are > nonetheless legitimate science (cloning a sheep for example). Significant > progress in terms of repeatability has been made however; take Energetics > in Israel (now at U of M) for example who had reach ~70-80% repeatability > in their cells. > > Mr. Franks I suggest you educate yourself more before storming in with > nonsense arguments that are outdated by almost 20 years. > > Regards, > John M > > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The major reaction in the Ni/H reaction is the fission reaction. You are >> wallowing in a morass of invalid information. Learn about the fractional >> quantum hall effect to get onto the right track. >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 7:28 PM, John Franks <jf27...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Dear Vortex, >>> >>> What is Faraday Efficiency and might it be behind some of the mistaken >>> claims of excess heat from LENR? >>> >>> And all this talk of "imagination" in other threads, relativistic >>> electrons, the lattice somehow doing something, how is it possible to get >>> two nucleons close enough for the strong force to take over? >>> >>> You can't get lower than the ground state and 0.1nm or so is a lot >>> larger than the 0.1pm and less to get significant fusion. This shielding >>> talk seems is bogus as is talk of "other types of nuclear reactions that >>> don't produce neutrons or gamma rays". >>> >>> Why can't you LENR people do one definitive experiment after all these >>> years (going on 25) and 100s of millions of dollars? >>> >>> JF. >>> >> >> >
