'Braze, you accept this claim based on a lecture by someone else and on only 4 mW of excess power?? *This is not a credible claim by any standard. '*
OK, Thank you. You do not think Swartz is credible. Gotcha. Your input is useful, truly. It undermines my faith in him as well. But then there is the small matter of the association with the MIT professor who obviously thinks he is credible. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > Braze, you accept this claim based on a lecture by someone else and on > only 4 mW of excess power?? This is not a credible claim by any standard. > > Ed Storms > > On Feb 10, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > > Watch at 2:38:00 > > He's reporting 27x gain and 4mW > > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> ' >> >> >> - Swartz has optimized his nanor device to produce consistent, high >> lenr+ cop >> >> That is news to me. What is the COP and what conditions is the value >> based on? >> >> ' >> >> Have you watched this video? >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Al7NMQLvATo >> >> >>> > >
