Edmund, you really need to watch the video. Swartz is claiming this is exactly what he needs to do. Produce the Nanor so other people can use it to scale up.
My point is - emphasis will not be placed on basic research until something is shown which excites people. Perhaps this is chicken and egg, but I think if Nanor does what it claims to do, it's the egg that we need. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > Swartz is credible! However, such a small effect is not a credible support > for investment in a working devoice. I did not make this clear. I hope it > is clear now. If Swartz supplies devices that survive testing, this would > be useful to basic research but not to a development study. My point is > that we need emphasis placed on basic research. > > Ed Storms > On Feb 10, 2014, at 4:50 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > > 'Braze, you accept this claim based on a lecture by someone else and on > only 4 mW of excess power?? *This is not a credible claim by any > standard. '* > > OK, Thank you. You do not think Swartz is credible. Gotcha. Your input > is useful, truly. It undermines my faith in him as well. But then there > is the small matter of the association with the MIT professor who obviously > thinks he is credible. > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > >> Braze, you accept this claim based on a lecture by someone else and on >> only 4 mW of excess power?? This is not a credible claim by any standard. >> >> Ed Storms >> >> On Feb 10, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: >> >> Watch at 2:38:00 >> >> He's reporting 27x gain and 4mW >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> ' >>> >>> >>> - Swartz has optimized his nanor device to produce consistent, high >>> lenr+ cop >>> >>> That is news to me. What is the COP and what conditions is the value >>> based on? >>> >>> ' >>> >>> Have you watched this video? >>> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Al7NMQLvATo >>> >>> >>>> >> >> > >
