Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: AGAIN, it's not 4mW excess, it's 4mW * 27 excess. IT was 4mW input, which > is obviously easy to measure. >
Ah, this is a new claim. That would be 100 mW output, which is easier to measure than his previous claims of 20 to 50 mW. > Swartz is doing one better than publishing a paper or giving a lecture. > He's selling the experimental devices so people can replicate in their own > labs. > Has he sold any yet? Did he say who he sold it to? Did he present any test results from other people, using other calorimeter types? > Please, people, watch the video before commenting. > I find his lectures somewhat incomprehensible. I'll wait for a paper. > You guys are credible only when you talk about something you know. > I know about his previous experiments and his previous papers. - Jed
