YOU said falls down. That assumes a mass and direction. Your statement of the experiment assumes a massive body being accelerated away from. if we are talking about in free space, then that is different.
However, dilation is based on velocity, not acceleration. I'm PRETTY positive on this one, and a cursory google search shows me not to have gone nuts in this regards. On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:40 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:12 PM, leaking pen <itsat...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Not at all, however, if you are accelerating at a rate away from the body >> that the clock is falling towards, >> > > No offence to you, but I thought that misunderstanding this was impossible. > You are not accelerating away from a gravity source the clock is falling > towards. > > These are 2 separate experiments related toEinstein's thought experiment > about either being in an elevator and being subjected to uniform > acceleration in free space (no gravity). > OR being in an elevator sitting on the ground. > > You can't tell which test you are undergoing everything seems identical, > So I am adding a test, you drop a clock, the instant the clock on the > accelerating elevator is let go of it assume a constant relative velocity > to every other object in space that is confusingly termed an inertial > reference frame, it is no longer accelerated. It can not be readily > justified to experience time dilation from acceleration it isn't undergoing. > > So either the same happens in the elevator test on the planet in the > gravity field also (which would be very dramatic in a black holes time > dilation field) OR it doesn't and the equivalence principle falls over, at > least wounded. > > As far as I am aware and can tell from looking, neither conclusion is > expected, but one must be true, or something even stranger that is also not > predicted a time dilation aura effecting objects around an accelerating > object. > > The rest you wrote as far as I could tell did not relate to what I am > proposing. > > John >
