http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jczBXmr7yo
This continuous video shows startup of a HHO Hot Cat from room temperature to 831F I wonder what electrode that the water clusters of come off of, the hydrogen electrode, the oxygen electrode or both. On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGWrJ9J5ffM > > This video shows HHO interaction with and without nanoparticle contact > with the catalytic convertor substrate. > > When the water crystals are allied to the catalytic substrate, full heat > capacity is produced. When the water crystals are filtered out of the HHO > gas stream by a fibrous pad, reduced heat capacity results. > > > On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6OZykbnLQw >> >> This demo shows how nanoparticles of water clusters can be reacted into >> heat in an auto catalectic converter. >> >> The HHO is the source of the nanoparticles "mouse" >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The Rossi reactor is currently configured into two functional parts, the >>> "mouse" whose function it is to produce nanoparticles, and the "Cat" whose >>> function it is to catalyze these nanoparticles in a LENR reaction. >>> >>> We can duplicate these functions by providing a nanoparticle source >>> (mouse) and a nanoparticle reactor (Cat). >>> >>> It is always better to "buy and tie" then to build from scratch. >>> >>> Any device that can produce fine nano sized droplets from a liquid >>> capable of supporting solid nano material will do. This atomization >>> function will support the Mouse function. >>> >>> I would recommend adding potassium carbonate to the Mouse colloid to >>> support the "secret sauce" function of Rossi's reactor. >>> >>> These possible mouse devices include a nebulizer, electric paint >>> sprayer, air brush, diesel fuel injector. >>> >>> I like the diesel fuel injector because it may produce a cavitation >>> effect during atomization. >>> >>> The Cat function might well be supported using a catalytic converter >>> from a late modeled car either new or slightly used. >>> >>> Engineers are doing some great stuff in the design of modern auto >>> catalytic converters as follows: >>> >>> >>> http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCgQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fphys.org%2Fnews204827696.html&ei=Ea0kU-e-EOWu0AG7qICoBg&usg=AFQjCNEXBT3yWSArLp8LfqHup2wCHoDFwA&sig2=txtrtVqF-Ff1ij4rs7QThw >>> >>> Warm the auto catalytic converter to 400C, and inject a stream of >>> nanoparticles formed by the Mouse into it. >>> >>> You may want to use heavy water to support the Mouse colloid as a way to >>> produce tritium as a LENR tracer which marks the onset of LENR activity. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 4:37 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Edmund Storms >>>> <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mar 15, 2014, at 10:30 AM, James Bowery wrote: >>>>> >>>>> 3) Identify which theories make predictions about modifications to the >>>>> experimental protocol (establish a range of hypotheses). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I find that all the present accepted theories conflict either with >>>>> behavior in LENR or with established natural law. I suggest we need to >>>>> start over. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Assuming that by "present accepted theories" you refer to the >>>> hysterical attempts to explain LENR to which we are continually exposed, I >>>> would suggest that there is a very simple treatment of this disease: >>>> >>>> "If your theory doesn't have an explanation for the success of this >>>> experimental protocol, then its no good. If your theory does have an >>>> explanation for the success of this experimental protocol, then there >>>> should be a range of modifications to the experimental protocol that your >>>> theory predicts will produce a range of predicted results. Enumerate said >>>> modifications in terms of the economy of: 1) Detecting the predicted >>>> results and 2) The discriminatory power of those results in terms of >>>> competing theories. If you cannot so enumerate such modifications, shut >>>> up." >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> 4) Based on plausibility and economy, experimentally test as many of >>>>> these hypotheses as practical. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Tests are being run, but they are based on obviously flawed theories. >>>>> What next? >>>>> >>>> >>>>> 5) Increase understanding of the NAE based on the results of these >>>>> experiments. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What good are the results from a flawed theory? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I have now defined my terms in sufficient operational detail to entail >>>> answers to these last two questions. >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
