Jones, these theoretical speculations have not been applied to cold fusion simply because they have no relationship to showing how to make the effect work on demand or to showing how the chemical environment plays a role. These are examples of mental games physics encourages that may or may not have any relationship to reality. Only years of effort supported by significant funding would be required to determine if these ideas have any value to physics or to LENR.
Right now, we need to determine how to make LENR work on demand. This means we need to understand the NAE. The details that these speculations address will be explored later by future graduate students. The discussions on Vortex would also be more useful if they focused on the NAE and how it can be created in real materials. Ed Storms On Mar 15, 2014, at 9:28 AM, Jones Beene wrote: > Kevin, > > If experiments in any field can demonstrate a high temperature version of a > Luttinger Condensate, then your insight is valid and can push forward LENR > technology. That is the main issue with anything Bosonic – can it be applied > at high temperature. > > All of the advances in LENR have been incremental and delayed. That Journal > issue you mention, from April 2008 - is almost 6 years old and is crammed > with relevant info for LENR, but little has been disseminated into actual > experiments after all the years. > > http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/10/4 > > > From: Kevin O'Malley > > Unfortunately for me, the 1 Dimensional Luttinger Bose-Einstein Condensate > seems to have already been proposed, but as far as I can tell, not as an > explanation of cold fusion: ***Also perhaps here. > > New Journal of Physics Volume 10 April 2008 > R Citro et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 045011 > > >
