A good path James, but with a few potholes. On Mar 15, 2014, at 10:30 AM, James Bowery wrote:
> The critical path seems to me to be: > > 1) Economically elicit statistically significant results. Rossi has done this but he has not reveal how. > 2) Formalize that economical method in an experimental protocol. Many ideas have been suggested but only Rossi has demonstrated a device. > 3) Identify which theories make predictions about modifications to the > experimental protocol (establish a range of hypotheses). I find that all the present accepted theories conflict either with behavior in LENR or with established natural law. I suggest we need to start over. > 4) Based on plausibility and economy, experimentally test as many of these > hypotheses as practical. Tests are being run, but they are based on obviously flawed theories. What next? > 5) Increase understanding of the NAE based on the results of these > experiments. What good are the results from a flawed theory? We need more competent theoreticians to take an interest and a way to evaluate proposed concepts. Right now we have a collection of established theories that exists as islands with no relationship to each other nor to what is generally known about LENR. Ed Storms > 6) Improve the economy with which statistically significant results may be > attained. > 7) Repeat from step 2. > > On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > ...Right now, we need to determine how to make LENR work on demand. This > means we need to understand the NAE. > > Ed Storms >
