I agree with you Daniel - it is a paradigm shift. However, if it is not communicated it is nothing. I think I said that there is a time to give info until then being silent is an option if you can reach the goal by yourself. Most people need help (mostly financial but even technical) and it is therefore required to communicate and inform. The communication needs to be following rules set up by the culture / society.
The problem just now, in my opinion, is that there are indications about at least one viable solution. As it is such a great thing if mastered there should be resources set aside to keep the all important information flow going without interruption. Your military scare is just as I mentioned before. Lack of information means a lot of rumors. I btw do not think the military can / will do anything as it is not feasible for a number of reasons. Already spread information is one and the fact that this an international community. Just cut the military out if they don't want to invest:) Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 6140 Horseshoe Bar Road Suite G, Loomis CA 95650 “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Lennart, > > High powered Cold Fusion is unlike any invention in the recorded history > of mankind. It is a paradigm shift of the greatest degree. Keeping it a > secret is not unreasonable. It would not be strange that in the event this > is proven true, military force may be used to acquire the technology. > > > 2014-05-15 13:40 GMT-03:00 Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com>: > > Axil, I think your conclusion is too simple. I will give you an example >> from my life. >> >> As a young business man it happened that I was interviewed by local >> newspapers. After a few interviews I was very disappointed and concluded; >> "To hell with the media they misunderstand everything". A few years later I >> had a corporate job and media was part of the job. A part I hated. However, >> after some time I had better luck and the outcome was more to my liking. (I >> am not saying I am good at it but I am better than when I was young:). >> >> What is the to find from that? That media has learnt to understand me? >> Nae, the other way around of course - I had figured out how to express >> myself better and in a way that I left very little room for interpretation. >> I think that we have the same issue with LENR demos. It is part of the >> 'job' to provide info and proof. It has to be done with integrity and >> without unclear assumptions/predictions. >> I also agree that if one cannot do the demos in a controlled way it is >> better to not do them. If not informing, there will, however, not be any >> recognition and in the long run the result is worth nothing. >> >> Best Regards , >> Lennart Thornros >> >> > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com >
