[snip] just for laughs… consider…
Two Ni-58 plus a proton equals 117 nucleons; and one Cu-63
plus one Fe-54 is the same.
Kullander supposedly found that about 21% of Rossi’s
starting nickel had been transmuted into 10% copper and 11% iron, and that
the copper and nickel were in natural isotopic proportions. The implication
is that some kind of musical-chairs shuffle of nucleons is possible (if we
believe his findings) and that nickel nucleons convert to copper and iron in
roughly equal proportions in a novel reaction. This is bizarre, but no more
so than anything else Rossi has claimed.
Maybe this novel reaction is Higgs-mediated :-)
What is a nucleon exchange reaction? Well, this is actually
not unheard of, and the Oppenheimer-Phillips reaction is the simple version.
It takes a lot of imagination to go any further than that, but there are a
few papers out there…
FWIW – the reason that the Higgs “particle” was mentioned as the catalyst
for a nucleon exchange reaction is that
1) The “particle” is more of an energy-sink than a real particle, based
on the way it was discovered and documented at LHC. The Higgs has the
features of a quanta of energy which is absorbed in an adjoining dimension
as a stabilizing mechanism or energy sink.
2) The putative mass energy of the Higgs is 125 GeV which is larger
than 117 nucleons, but possibly within a working range of resonance.
3) The hypothesis is that the Higgs quanta is induced into 3-space by
some mechanism related to the very high nuclear stability of nickel, and
that it forms a kind of ghostly shadow on the reactants, resulting in
nucleon exchange which Kullander discovered.
4) After all, we are still trying to find a justification for the $5
billion bucks or more which was spent on LHC in order to obtain this ghostly
bit of information
In conclusion, this adds a whole new meaning to “Zeitgeist” or should that
be “Geisteskrank”
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
