I believe that LENR is many centuries ahead of its time. Let us understand this paradigm changing device through an like example.
Let us put ourselves back to the year 1014 AD. Imagine that a smart phone was given to a monk who toiled for most of his cloistered life coping one book and you told him to prove that with this device he could now copy and sent that book to someone across the world in 5 seconds. Even this monk who accepts the concept of miracles might be somewhat confused and call in some additional members of his order to help him with the test. When looking more deeply into the physical principles that make this smart phone work, the monk and his fellows might need some additional time to research new physical concepts in more depth than their collective knowledge base may be expected to support. This could take some additional time. Maybe the time it takes this monk and his fellows to test the smart phone would extent a longer than was originally expected. After all they are dealing with understanding a miracle. On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com> wrote: > Hello Kevin, > No Swedes are not immune to any bad things. I was hesitating before I > wrote my post as I could hear that protest. However, it is a small and > homogeneous country where the head of (the CIA of Sweden) is forced to > explain himself. He is criticized for having collaborated with the US > intelligence (CIA) and he says "I am sorry" on national TV. BTW I have > said that smaller entities are easier to handle than larger.:) > > Of course lies exist. It is a great country to be a journalist as you have > so much access. The people we talk about would not take any chances. They > for certain are not entrepreneurial or risk takers in any form or shape. > > I am saying I believe - your opinion is as good as mine just my believe - > that there is a conflict between people and that some say 'let us publish', > while other say > > we get the question xyz- what are we saying. Conclusion let us find out > and delay, which is better than showing an unprofessional behavior in the > mind of those guys. > > I agree they did not sign up to answer the theory. However, I think they > want to have theory that support the findings. It would be covering that > special part we all are concerned about. To make another test to find out > exactly how much CU and Fe and Ni that has been involved and the isotopes > must be of value as I think they listen to you guys who are providing > theories and ask questions all the time. Good of course but making the > people involved feeling they need answers to the different ideas they did > not answered before - and for which they found themselves without clear > answers. You can say that given the situation it is bullshit behavior. OK I > can see that point it does not change what I think and I do not know nor > communicate with either one of them. > > Your insider idea is not possible, Yes, I agree that they should have > lived up to their promises about timeline. However, I have been in many > situations where you just cannot get anywhere by saying it is no good, when > people say they need more time. They are in no hurry - but for the purpose > of insider trading - no way. > > Sorry Kevin you need to meet with more people. They mostly protest about > the missing pickles. Most often such issues take size not proportional to > their roles in the whole - just look on our political debate. > > I understand that people are suffering from poor performance or lack of > personal accountability for promises made. That does not change anything. I > have often been in that situation when lack of decisions have cost me. I > think most business leaders have been there. No fun I agree. I am not > defending the lack of accountability - I merely tried to give you the > internal reasons I think they have and combined with their environmental > situation. It is still 3 out of 300 month - 1%. > >
