I see… My conceptual framework is different. Here is what I believe… The NiH reaction is based on extensive dipole oscillations. This implies that the atoms are mostly striped of electrons and are all all highly polarized. The holes (ions) are all grouped on the + side of the micro particle and the electrons are all grouped on the negative side. This is standard nanoplasmonic theory.
About 6 * 10^^23 electrons form a soliton at the tip of each of the many nanowires extending off the surface of the 5 micron particle where the electrons become entangled with infrared photons to form surface plasmon polaritons(SPP). This soliton produces a huge magnetic field that is projected onto the hydrogen ions… mostly in Rydberg crystals of hydrogen which are attracted to the SPP solitons. These magnetic fields fuse hydrogen mostly into lithium, boron, and beryllium. The energy of the fusion reactions are carried back down the magnetic fields projected by the SPP soliton and are absorbs by the Bose Einstein condensate (BEC) of the soliton ensemble. All the energy levels of all the solitons are the same because of something called a BEC blockade since all the quantum properties of the BEC members must be equal including their energy. Because of BEC entanglement, when the fusion energy of the latest LENR reaction is fed into one particular soliton, it is shared among all the other millions of solitons at the tips of all the nanowires throughout all the micro particles. The power of the magnetic field that causes the fusion through soliton projection is also amplified by many millions because all the solitons are entangled and share their power. There are no atoms with electron orbits to be linked to the nucleus: everything is ionized through vigorous dipole motion. Gammas can appear when not all the solitons are linked into the global BEC ensemble. When the reactor is cool, infrared Photon sharing between solitons is not effective at linking all the solitons together so there initially forms small islands of solitons. Being very small in number, each island of SPP BEC cannot completely thermalize the gammas though complete BEC superatom energy sharing. On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In terms of LENR. why is it important to have the spin of the nucleus >> affect the elections? ... IMHO, the spin of the nucleus must be 0 for LENR >> to occur in that nucleus. Moving spin from the nucleus to the elections >> gains us nothing. >> > > There's two different contexts in this thread. One is the original > context you provided, which is that the spin of the nucleus is somehow > important to making LENR happen (I have no opinion on this question). The > other context is one that Bob has suggested, which is that spin coupling > might be able to provide a channel from the nucleus to the electrons > through which the energy of a gamma transition can be dissipated. In the > first context, it might not matter whether the possible spin interactions > are bidirectional. In the second context, the possibility is that the > energy of a fusion might flow out of the compound nucleus and thermalize > through excitation of the electrons via spin coupling, in which case it's > important that the nucleons be able to transfer energy to the electrons. > > Eric > >
