I only when through the recording once, so what you say might be so. But he did not expound on the importance of how free electrons can form vortexes as an energy concentration mechanism. Electron orbitals can never achieve the degree of localization and the concentration necessary for the proper constraint of electrons demonstrated by localization.
Electron orbitals are a dead end, it is the behavior of free electrons that are the key to LENR. On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Axil -- Perhaps you missed it, but he refers to both spintronics and the > vortex-like character of cooperative electron orbitals. So no, I don't > think he's neglecting the relevance of spin on that scale. He even > references the work of Hotson, who puts lots of emphasis on the untapped > potential of spin. > > > On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Most scientists are constrained in their focus by their specialization >> to a limited field of study. To understand a system fully, many fields of >> study must be considered to put all the pieces together. >> >> >> >> One obvious area of inquiry that Ahern never pursued is to understand how >> magnetism affects the vacuum and/or nuclear stability. >> >> >> >> Another important piece of the puzzle that Ahern neglects in the critical >> role of quantum mechanics plays as a powerful amplification mechanism >> toward powering up Nanomagnetism to huge levels. When the dimensions of the >> lattice get below 100 nm, quantum effects predominate. To understand >> Nanomagnetism, quantum mechanics is the sole factor that reveals all the >> facts in the story of the nano system >> >> >> >> Furthermore, Ahern never mentions the pivotal role the spin plays in >> Nanomagnetism, including what defeats Nanomagnetism and what supports it. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Yeah he's pretty dismissive of the Heat/Helium work, which I disagree >>> with for PdD at least, and we're still waiting on reliable ash measurements >>> from NiH, but he's of course entitled to his opinion and I still have a lot >>> of respect for his views. I think, like he said, his theory applies better >>> to mysterious electromagnetic "free energy" systems than it does to LENR, >>> but he thinks the same phenomenon is at play in both. >>> >>> I think non-linear anharmonic modes may indeed be at play here. As I >>> think I mentioned in the interview, on a personal level, I like the analogy >>> of loaded hydride in a wet or gaseous system as a non-equilibrium, >>> non-linear, open system of sorts -- so I think energy concentration (in >>> "violation" of the second law) may indeed be at play. But on the flip side >>> I can't totally dismiss Storms' point of view that doesn't think any sort >>> of abnormal energy concentration is necessary -- that linear >>> reaction-diffusion can get H/D to the NAE efficiently enough without >>> needing to invoke non-linear dynamics. It's hard to say. >>> >>> I'm hoping the ash analysis being carried out by ELFORSK can shed some >>> light on what's going on (i.e. fusion or not fusion). I'm banking on that, >>> because I don't really have a lot of faith DGT will be releasing a wealth >>> of mass spectrometer work anytime soon, even though they promised to at >>> last years ICCF. >>> >>> Regards, >>> John >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> This is an excellent interview. Have not finished yet, but there are >>>> a few things to add. Ahern is strongly impressed with a magnetic invention >>>> (Manelas device) since he did the 8 day test - and which device others have >>>> belittled. It is similar to the Floyd Sweet device (for the historians of >>>> overunity). The cross-connection to LENR is not easy to explain but is >>>> there. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> It can be noted up front that Ahern does not believe that there is any >>>> evidence whatsoever for nuclear fusion in LENR. That includes deuterium >>>> fusion to helium and especially Ni-H. He thinks it is all nanomagnetic. >>>> Nanomagnetism is roughly equivalent to a combination of superferromagnetism >>>> and superparamagnetism. They are two are extremes of the same phenomenon. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> He believes that the helium seen in Pd-D is basically measurement error >>>> - noise. Krivit is probably pleased with that assessment. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Alan Fletcher >>>> >>>> Foks0904 wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm sure many of you know of Brian Ahern from his EPRI report, his >>>> MIT colloquium appearance earlier this year, and now his collaboration with >>>> MFMP. Even if you're not aware of him, I think this conversation has enough >>>> for 3-4 threads worth of topics. We even flirt with the ever-so-dangerous & >>>> taboo possibility of "perpetual motion". Titled: "Nanomagnetism, >>>> Cooperative Modes, & Non-Linear LENR". Hope you guys/gals enjoy: >>>> >>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_kID_E-3tY >>>> >>>> An outline can be found here: >>>> http://jmag0904.wordpress.com/2014/07/25/dr-brian-ahern-nanomagnetism-cooperative-modes-non-linear-lenr/ >>>> >>>> >>>> That's a MUST-LISTEN link. (And I'm only half-way through!) >>>> >>>> Goes into some of the history of anharmonic modes (related to discrete >>>> breathers, Quodons we've discussed recently). >>>> >>>> At about 19minutes he says superconductivity and >>>> (super?)-ferro-magnetism are closely related (and that the latter persists >>>> up to a thousand degrees.). >>>> >>>> Then I *think* he says that LENR could be a localized ferromagnetic >>>> effect tapping into vacuum energy. >>>> >>>> Needs a transcript. >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
