On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *it is in these domains of the nano-material that these coherent > structures can become stable * > > There are only a few particles that stay together for an extended period > of time, only the proton really. The neutron will stay around within the > context of the proton, but will decay when isolated on its own. > > > > Solitons can stay stable in the context of the BEC for as long as the BEC > endures but will decay when isolated on its own. > > > > The application of energy to air will catalyze a polariton soliton, but > that vortex will rapidly decay. A high energy electron produced by beta > decay might produce a polariton soliton, when the emitted electron releases > its energy in a collision with a nitrogen molecule. But that soliton does > not stay around very long, it decays in Picoseconds. The same is true for > spark discharge in air. However, if the spark vaporizes material, say an > aluminum sheet, a cooling plasma of aluminum will supply nano and micro > particles together with the electrons and the photons in the spark > discharge within a contextual medium to catalyze a polariton soliton BEC. > The energy of the discharge is great enough to form a BEC. With the support > of this polariton BEC, this soliton ensemble persists and is localized for > long enough to transmute the surrounding material through the projection of > a coherent anapole magnetic field (a monopole field). > > > > Ken Shoulders saw this whole process unfold in this research, but he never > added the polariton and the associated BEC context to his experimental > explanations. > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> picking up and displacing very "fine grained" material and re-depositing >> it elsewhere >> >> With all respect, this is some conceptual junk that you pick up along the >> way as an inappropriate analogy. >> >> The key is that the magnetic field has an effect on the vacuum which >> results in a complicated set of results. Spin flipping (the Higgs >> mechanism) cannot be described in any context with the sedimentation of >> material. >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I'm not so sure one needs to posit Higgs Field interactions -- maybe. I >>> see it in a very basic way without too much esoterica. In over-unity >>> electrical systems (possibly cold fusion) we initiate non-linear coupling >>> between appropriate materials. This non-linear coupling produces these >>> collective anharmonic modes. Moray B. King calls them "ion acoustical >>> modes", T. Henry Moray was one of the first to propose this mechanism was >>> at play in his plasma tubes. Harold Aspden eventually arrived at the same >>> conclusion while attempting to explain the Correa PAGD -- which both he and >>> Mallove believed was legitimate. >>> >>> So once the non-linear mode is setup, if all the conditions for material >>> requirements and proper integration are met, the system will set up these >>> nano-vortices -- usually magnetic -- which, like any other vortex, is quite >>> good at picking up and displacing very "fine grained" material and >>> re-depositing it elsewhere -- in this case from the "Aether" into >>> our 3D-space (Higgs field, ZPF, or whatever) (think of a longitudinal wave >>> in a riverbed). We know ball-lightning solitons result from >>> fracto-emissions -- perhaps it is in these domains of the nano-material >>> that these coherent structures can become stable and setup resonance with >>> the vacuum. >>> >>> All speculation of course. >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Another area that Ahern needs to look into is the way the Higgs field >>>> seems to connect together magnetism and quantum chromodynamics (QCD), >>>> which is the theory of quark-gluon interactions. >>>> >>>> When Ahern is postulating that nanomagnitism is effecting the vacuum, >>>> he may mean to address how the Higgs field and nanomagnitism interact, >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Most scientists are constrained in their focus by their >>>>> specialization to a limited field of study. To understand a system fully, >>>>> many fields of study must be considered to put all the pieces together. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> One obvious area of inquiry that Ahern never pursued is to understand >>>>> how magnetism affects the vacuum and/or nuclear stability. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Another important piece of the puzzle that Ahern neglects in the >>>>> critical role of quantum mechanics plays as a powerful amplification >>>>> mechanism toward powering up Nanomagnetism to huge levels. When the >>>>> dimensions of the lattice get below 100 nm, quantum effects predominate. >>>>> To >>>>> understand Nanomagnetism, quantum mechanics is the sole factor that >>>>> reveals >>>>> all the facts in the story of the nano system >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Furthermore, Ahern never mentions the pivotal role the spin plays in >>>>> Nanomagnetism, including what defeats Nanomagnetism and what supports it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yeah he's pretty dismissive of the Heat/Helium work, which I disagree >>>>>> with for PdD at least, and we're still waiting on reliable ash >>>>>> measurements >>>>>> from NiH, but he's of course entitled to his opinion and I still have a >>>>>> lot >>>>>> of respect for his views. I think, like he said, his theory applies >>>>>> better >>>>>> to mysterious electromagnetic "free energy" systems than it does to LENR, >>>>>> but he thinks the same phenomenon is at play in both. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think non-linear anharmonic modes may indeed be at play here. As I >>>>>> think I mentioned in the interview, on a personal level, I like the >>>>>> analogy >>>>>> of loaded hydride in a wet or gaseous system as a non-equilibrium, >>>>>> non-linear, open system of sorts -- so I think energy concentration (in >>>>>> "violation" of the second law) may indeed be at play. But on the flip >>>>>> side >>>>>> I can't totally dismiss Storms' point of view that doesn't think any sort >>>>>> of abnormal energy concentration is necessary -- that linear >>>>>> reaction-diffusion can get H/D to the NAE efficiently enough without >>>>>> needing to invoke non-linear dynamics. It's hard to say. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm hoping the ash analysis being carried out by ELFORSK can shed >>>>>> some light on what's going on (i.e. fusion or not fusion). I'm banking on >>>>>> that, because I don't really have a lot of faith DGT will be releasing a >>>>>> wealth of mass spectrometer work anytime soon, even though they promised >>>>>> to >>>>>> at last years ICCF. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> John >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> This is an excellent interview. Have not finished yet, but there >>>>>>> are a few things to add. Ahern is strongly impressed with a magnetic >>>>>>> invention (Manelas device) since he did the 8 day test - and which >>>>>>> device >>>>>>> others have belittled. It is similar to the Floyd Sweet device (for the >>>>>>> historians of overunity). The cross-connection to LENR is not easy to >>>>>>> explain but is there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It can be noted up front that Ahern does not believe that there is >>>>>>> any evidence whatsoever for nuclear fusion in LENR. That includes >>>>>>> deuterium >>>>>>> fusion to helium and especially Ni-H. He thinks it is all nanomagnetic. >>>>>>> Nanomagnetism is roughly equivalent to a combination of >>>>>>> superferromagnetism >>>>>>> and superparamagnetism. They are two are extremes of the same >>>>>>> phenomenon. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He believes that the helium seen in Pd-D is basically measurement >>>>>>> error - noise. Krivit is probably pleased with that assessment. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *From:* Alan Fletcher >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Foks0904 wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm sure many of you know of Brian Ahern from his EPRI report, his >>>>>>> MIT colloquium appearance earlier this year, and now his collaboration >>>>>>> with >>>>>>> MFMP. Even if you're not aware of him, I think this conversation has >>>>>>> enough >>>>>>> for 3-4 threads worth of topics. We even flirt with the >>>>>>> ever-so-dangerous & >>>>>>> taboo possibility of "perpetual motion". Titled: "Nanomagnetism, >>>>>>> Cooperative Modes, & Non-Linear LENR". Hope you guys/gals enjoy: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_kID_E-3tY >>>>>>> >>>>>>> An outline can be found here: >>>>>>> http://jmag0904.wordpress.com/2014/07/25/dr-brian-ahern-nanomagnetism-cooperative-modes-non-linear-lenr/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's a MUST-LISTEN link. (And I'm only half-way through!) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Goes into some of the history of anharmonic modes (related to >>>>>>> discrete breathers, Quodons we've discussed recently). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> At about 19minutes he says superconductivity and >>>>>>> (super?)-ferro-magnetism are closely related (and that the latter >>>>>>> persists >>>>>>> up to a thousand degrees.). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then I *think* he says that LENR could be a localized ferromagnetic >>>>>>> effect tapping into vacuum energy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Needs a transcript. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
