In my opinion. Calorimetry using water is a non-starter. There is just to
many points of entry where error can creep in. The biggest of which would be,
will a hydrino transition even occur under water. It seems to me that it would
electrolyze and split the water first before it initiates a hydrino transition
reaction. Remember Ed's mantra - you can not ignore the Chemical environment.
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Higgins
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:SunCell - Initial Replication Attempt
In his previous bomb calorimetry, only a COP of about 2 was reported. I have
previously pointed out in detail the flaw in this calorimetry owing to the
variable heat taken away by the large copper electrodes between the control and
the actual experiment. Because of this flaw, the COP could be substantially
over-estimated - easily by a factor of 2. Thus, even the COP of 2 was not
"demonstrated".
I think it extremely unlikely that by controlling the gap you could tune the
energy delivered down by even 50%. This type of welder has no separate means
of initiating plasma - it requires the contact. It probably has a saturable
core to limit the current flow. A special apparatus would be needed to deliver
an ignition pulse and then a controlled energy in the plasma conduction. This
would probably be a regulated capacitor discharge circuitry to get to the very
high current, but short pulse needed to create a 5 joule ignition. I think
there is no chance to verify a 5 joule ignition with this spot welder setup.
Best case is to replicate what Mills has done with ~200 joule input and with
better calorimetry (for example, doing it with the electrodes under water).
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Jojo Iznart <jojoiznar...@gmail.com> wrote:
In his bomb calorimetry demo, he demonstrated an input of about 200+ J.
Correct me if I'm wrong cause I'm working from memory here. In the bomb
calorimetry, they seems to have demonstrated a COP of 4+
I think the spot welder need to be modified to maintain a fix gap between
the electrodes where the fuel pellet needs to be slightly wedged in. This way,
as soon as the fuel pellet detonates, that automatically stops the welder from
delivering more power, since there would be a gap where no further current can
flow. The open voltage of the welder would not jump the gap. If we did this,
we can control how much input energy is being delivered. From there, we can
verify the 5J claim.
