Recall that the bulk results show 57% Li-6 enrichment, vs. 92% surface enrichment. I believe the higher fraction of Li-6 on the surface is the result of starvation of the reaction cycle resulting in an excess of Li-6 as compared to the steady-state balance during operation, which is reflected in the bulk composition.
Read these messages for further details: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98020.html (msg has an error, should read ni62, not ni68) http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98350.html http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98422.html -Bob _____________________________________________ From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 4:35 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: Isotope conversion completeness, was RE: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in Ok - I can buy the cyclic reaction, but how do you explain the great preponderance of Li-6 in the ash, compared to all other isotopes? That does not indicate a cycle so much as a major shift... and where are the intermediaries in the nearly pure sample - which would indicate one neutron at a time? Surely you are not suggesting multi-body? _____________________________________________ From: Robert Ellefson Jones, I can only give you the assurances that I received from the report itself. All of the claims I am making are coming from there. Pages 28 and 53 describe the ICP methods as involving the entire sample mass. I do not believe this is indicative of fraud. I believe this indicates a cyclic reaction is occurring that results in a steady-state heat-generating reaction that cycles between Li-7 and Li-6 and results in Ni-62 enrichment. I put some more thoughts into this message: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg98422.html -Bob _____________________________________________ From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 4:16 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: Isotope conversion completeness, was RE: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in Let me put it this way, if what you say is true - that the sample tested to 99.3% purity of Ni-62, then we have a major problem. Are you certain? ...this information is very important, so please assure us that is true. Jones From: Robert Ellefson First, as I explain in this (rather-long-winded) mail from yesterday, the ENTIRE ASH SAMPLE BULK was analyzed by ICP-MS as consisting of 99.3% enriched Ni-62. ( see: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98350.html ) Allow me to repeat this crucially-important point: The 2.13mg ash sample contained 2.12mg of PURE Nickel-62. Only the SEM/EDS and ToF-SIMS methods are restricted to analyzing the surface-layer composition.
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
