Thanks! Harry
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Robert Ellefson <vortex-h...@e2ke.com> wrote: > Harry and Jones, > > > > I do not believe that the discovery of highly-enriched isotopes is the > result of fraud. I think that the variable fractions of isotopes between > the surface and the bulk of the ash indicates that isotopic enrichment was > occurring in-situ. The apparent fact (if true) that the bulk of the nickel > is 99.3% Ni-62, while it is 98.7% Ni-62 on the surface, along with an even > larger lithium isotope gradient from surface-to-bulk, demonstrates that we > are looking at the ash of a nuclear reaction, and not a faked result. I > have no idea how Rossi could achieve such gradients in with a > laboratory-supply feedstock of enriched nickel achieving both the surface > morphology that the ash grain displayed and the isotope fractionation > gradient that it displayed. I highly doubt this would be possible to fake > even with tremendous effort. > > > > So, rather than providing evidence of fraud, I very much believe that this > isotope fractionation gradient clearly indicates that some kind of nuclear > reaction is taking place in during this experiment. > > > > -Bob > > > > > > *From:* H Veeder Saturday, October 11, 2014 9:20 PM > > Can this be used to challenge Pomp's claim that the ash was faked by > commercially available enriched isotopes? > > > > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Robert Ellefson <vortex-h...@e2ke.com> > wrote: > > Recall that the bulk results show 57% Li-6 enrichment, vs. 92% surface > enrichment. I believe the higher fraction of Li-6 on the surface is the > result of starvation of the reaction cycle resulting in an excess of Li-6 > as > compared to the steady-state balance during operation, which is reflected > in > the bulk composition. > > Read these messages for further details: > http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98020.html (msg has > an > error, should read ni62, not ni68) > http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98350.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98422.html > >
