Do-not-reply wrote: >You are wrong. Your non sanguine tactics are ,"bad mojo." Cookies are >quite capable of doing everything you would like for uses of tracking >sessions in networks of computers. > This is true, cookies *can* do those things, but I would argue that for what the 'net has become/is becoming, and specifically for this application, a stateless protocol is simply not the most elegant solution.
-sconzey _______________________________________________ vos-d mailing list vos-d@interreality.org http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d
