didn't scream at me that way...  
I commit then save and reboot  
   
But on reboot I see the message on ipsec_setup  defaultroute cannot cope!!!!  
and also this one  
Starting Wan Interfaces: FATAL Error Inserting wanpipe 
(/lib/modules/2.6.20/kernel/drivers/net/wan/wanpipe.ko)   
No such Interface  
   
As I said nothing is plugged in yet, to the intefaces purely jsut test 
enviroment at present so not sure if this has anything to do with anything or 
not, but if i plug hub in interfaces become green light, but did not take it 
any further on pinging, etc   
   
Thanks  

Jeff  


       _____  

  From: Allan Leinwand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 
Sent: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:02:11 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Am I right on this config

Hi Jeff,

Try "set protocols static route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 222.2.1.97".

We use CIDR equivalents format for netmasks (examples here on wikipedia: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classful_network).

Take care,

Allan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2007 7:52:04 AM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles
Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Am I right on this config

below was wrongly typed it was as follows (Sorry) 
Its displays 
ERROR: argument "0.0.0.0" is not Valid. Allowed type(s): "IPv4Net" or "IPv6Net" 

_____ 

From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
Sent: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 10:43:56 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Am I right on this config


Ok one problem 
when i enter set protocols static route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 next-hop 222.2.1.97 

Its displays 
ERROR: argument "0.0.0" is not Valid. Allowed type(s): "IPv4Net" or "IPv6Net" 

What am I doing wrong? 

Jeff
_____ 

From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
Sent: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:46:08 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Am I right on this config


ok all thanks will enter this config and see what happens 

_____ 

From: Justin Fletcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
Sent: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:15:21 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Am I right on this config

Yes, looks about right, but I'd make one change. As those two /28s
are contiguous, I'd change eth0 to to
set interface ethernet eth0 address 111.1.1.30 prefix-length 27
which covers the same address range but only uses one of your
allocated addresses.

Personally, I always like having a name server configured - it can
make diagnostics a bit easier.

Best,
Justin

On 9/14/07, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Router Config
> I am going to use Vyatta with a Time Warner fiber connection
>
> I have 28 addresses assigned to us
>
> as follows (ip's changed for sake of security)
>
> on ethernet 0 (2 subnets)
> set interfaces ethernet eth0 address 111.1.1.30 prefix-length 28
>
> set interfaces ethernet eth0 address 111.1.1.45 prefix-length 28
>
>
> on ethernet 01 (subnet gateway to Timewarner)
> set interfaces ethernet eth1 address 222.2.1.98 prefix-length 30
>
> Default Route
> set protocols static route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 next-hop 222.2.1.97
>
> Basically is this all I really need to route in and out, and am I correct in
> my assumptions?
> Also should I declare nameservers entrys?
> I do not want to use any firewall rules, just simple routing..
>
> I know I want ssh access in etc, but I understand that, I almost need to
> test this live, and am trying to make sure I am on the right path here.
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Vyatta-users mailing list
> Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
> http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users
>
>







      
   
 
_______________________________________________
Vyatta-users mailing list
Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users

Reply via email to