Ok I will see what happens on live test tomorrow, and thanks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on
this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_____
From: Aubrey Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Sent: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:29:44 -0400
Subject: RE: [Vyatta-users] Am I right on this config
The wanpipe error is because you don't have any t1/e1/t3 interaces, it will
always happen unless you install one, don't worry about it. I always get the
ipsec deault route thing as well, I think its because there are no VPN tunnels
up. It doesn't mean you don't have a 0/0 route. Hope this helps. :)
-------------------------------
Aubrey Wells (mobile)
Senior Engineer
Shelton | Johns Technology Group
sheltonjohns.com
-----Original Message-----
From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
Sent: 9/15/07 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Am I right on this config
didn't scream at me that way...
I commit then save and reboot
But on reboot I see the message on ipsec_setup defaultroute cannot cope!!!!
and also this one
Starting Wan Interfaces: FATAL Error Inserting wanpipe
(/lib/modules/2.6.20/kernel/drivers/net/wan/wanpipe.ko)
No such Interface
As I said nothing is plugged in yet, to the intefaces purely jsut test
enviroment at present so not sure if this has anything to do with anything or
not, but if i plug hub in interfaces become green light, but did not take it
any further on pinging, etc
Thanks
Jeff
_____
From: Allan Leinwand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Sent: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:02:11 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Am I right on this config
Hi Jeff,
Try "set protocols static route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 222.2.1.97".
We use CIDR equivalents format for netmasks (examples here on wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classful_network).
Take care,
Allan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2007 7:52:04 AM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles
Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Am I right on this config
below was wrongly typed it was as follows (Sorry)
Its displays
ERROR: argument "0.0.0.0" is not Valid. Allowed type(s): "IPv4Net" or "IPv6Net"
_____
From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
Sent: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 10:43:56 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Am I right on this config
Ok one problem
when i enter set protocols static route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 next-hop 222.2.1.97
Its displays
ERROR: argument "0.0.0" is not Valid. Allowed type(s): "IPv4Net" or "IPv6Net"
What am I doing wrong?
Jeff
_____
From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
Sent: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:46:08 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Am I right on this config
ok all thanks will enter this config and see what happens
_____
From: Justin Fletcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
Sent: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:15:21 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Am I right on this config
Yes, looks about right, but I'd make one change. As those two /28s
are contiguous, I'd change eth0 to to
set interface ethernet eth0 address 111.1.1.30 prefix-length 27
which covers the same address range but only uses one of your
allocated addresses.
Personally, I always like having a name server configured - it can
make diagnostics a bit easier.
Best,
Justin
On 9/14/07, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Router Config
> I am going to use Vyatta with a Time Warner fiber connection
>
> I have 28 addresses assigned to us
>
> as follows (ip's changed for sake of security)
>
> on ethernet 0 (2 subnets)
> set interfaces ethernet eth0 address 111.1.1.30 prefix-length 28
>
> set interfaces ethernet eth0 address 111.1.1.45 prefix-length 28
>
>
> on ethernet 01 (subnet gateway to Timewarner)
> set interfaces ethernet eth1 address 222.2.1.98 prefix-length 30
>
> Default Route
> set protocols static route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 next-hop 222.2.1.97
>
> Basically is this all I really need to route in and out, and am I correct in
> my assumptions?
> Also should I declare nameservers entrys?
> I do not want to use any firewall rules, just simple routing..
>
> I know I want ssh access in etc, but I understand that, I almost need to
> test this live, and am trying to make sure I am on the right path here.
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Vyatta-users mailing list
> Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
> http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Vyatta-users mailing list
Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users
