Looks like this is too limited to be useful. On Monday, 17 December 2012 01:08:41 UTC-6, viniciusban wrote: > > Brypthon doesn't support string interpolation, too. :-( > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Arnon Marcus > <a.m.m...@gmail.com<javascript:>> > wrote: > > From what I saw, it does not support many fundamental features of > python, > > like class-inheritance (class, classMethod) modules (__import__, from, > as), > > scope (globals, nonlocal) and parsing (exec, eval). I think these are > > trivial for python developement, and should have some kind of > design-pattern > > transpiling specification that it follows. > > I think CoffeeScript actually has many of these already implemented, as > is > > quite pythonic already in much of it's syntax - and is much closer to > > JavaScript in the first place and already has tons of tools for > denugging, > > client/server-side automatic-transpiling, bundled up in > > minification/compression algorythms, etc... > > > > It's a cool idea, and pyjammas has existed for a long time now, but is > > anyone seriously thinking about using that in production? > > > > I think as long as browsers don't have some kind of cross-language VMs, > or > > at least a PVM built-in/plugin, than with all the excitement, it will > remain > > useless. > > I mean, how do you debug this? > > > > -- > > > > > > >
--
