How do you debug this?
Is here a source-map generation mechanism to allow debugging python code in
the browser's debugger?
Can the transpiler run server-side?


On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Francois Dion <francois.d...@gmail.com>wrote:

> If you have had issues with these, you should report the bugs, because It
> does support string interpolation, modules and scope. List comprehension
> and the ternary operator have been added earlier this week. Classes is the
> main thing left. I started using brython in a limited deployment. I think
> the python module import loading thru ajax works well in my scenario, up to
> now, but I'll let this run for a little while more.
>
> François
>
> --
> www.pyptug.org  -  raspberry-python.blogspot.com
>
>
> On Monday, December 17, 2012 2:08:41 AM UTC-5, viniciusban wrote:
>
>> Brypthon doesn't support string interpolation, too. :-(
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Arnon Marcus <a.m.m...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > From what I saw, it does not support many fundamental features of
>> python,
>> > like class-inheritance (class, classMethod) modules (__import__, from,
>> as),
>> > scope (globals, nonlocal) and parsing (exec, eval). I think these are
>> > trivial for python developement, and should have some kind of
>> design-pattern
>> > transpiling specification that it follows.
>> > I think CoffeeScript actually has many of these already implemented, as
>> is
>> > quite pythonic already in much of it's syntax - and is much closer to
>> > JavaScript in the first place and already has tons of tools for
>> denugging,
>> > client/server-side automatic-transpiling, bundled up in
>> > minification/compression algorythms, etc...
>> >
>> > It's a cool idea, and pyjammas has existed for a long time now, but is
>> > anyone seriously thinking about using that in production?
>> >
>> > I think as long as browsers don't have some kind of cross-language VMs,
>> or
>> > at least a PVM built-in/plugin, than with all the excitement, it will
>> remain
>> > useless.
>> > I mean, how do you debug this?
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>  --
>
>
>
>

-- 



Reply via email to