Thanks for letting us know. Are you one of the brython developers? On Friday, 21 December 2012 15:20:28 UTC-6, Francois Dion wrote: > > If you have had issues with these, you should report the bugs, because It > does support string interpolation, modules and scope. List comprehension > and the ternary operator have been added earlier this week. Classes is the > main thing left. I started using brython in a limited deployment. I think > the python module import loading thru ajax works well in my scenario, up to > now, but I'll let this run for a little while more. > > François > > -- > www.pyptug.org - raspberry-python.blogspot.com > > On Monday, December 17, 2012 2:08:41 AM UTC-5, viniciusban wrote: >> >> Brypthon doesn't support string interpolation, too. :-( >> >> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Arnon Marcus <a.m.m...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > From what I saw, it does not support many fundamental features of >> python, >> > like class-inheritance (class, classMethod) modules (__import__, from, >> as), >> > scope (globals, nonlocal) and parsing (exec, eval). I think these are >> > trivial for python developement, and should have some kind of >> design-pattern >> > transpiling specification that it follows. >> > I think CoffeeScript actually has many of these already implemented, as >> is >> > quite pythonic already in much of it's syntax - and is much closer to >> > JavaScript in the first place and already has tons of tools for >> denugging, >> > client/server-side automatic-transpiling, bundled up in >> > minification/compression algorythms, etc... >> > >> > It's a cool idea, and pyjammas has existed for a long time now, but is >> > anyone seriously thinking about using that in production? >> > >> > I think as long as browsers don't have some kind of cross-language VMs, >> or >> > at least a PVM built-in/plugin, than with all the excitement, it will >> remain >> > useless. >> > I mean, how do you debug this? >> > >> > -- >> > >> > >> > >> >
--
