I agree. On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Massimo Di Pierro <massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looks like this is too limited to be useful. > > > On Monday, 17 December 2012 01:08:41 UTC-6, viniciusban wrote: >> >> Brypthon doesn't support string interpolation, too. :-( >> >> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Arnon Marcus <a.m.m...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > From what I saw, it does not support many fundamental features of >> > python, >> > like class-inheritance (class, classMethod) modules (__import__, from, >> > as), >> > scope (globals, nonlocal) and parsing (exec, eval). I think these are >> > trivial for python developement, and should have some kind of >> > design-pattern >> > transpiling specification that it follows. >> > I think CoffeeScript actually has many of these already implemented, as >> > is >> > quite pythonic already in much of it's syntax - and is much closer to >> > JavaScript in the first place and already has tons of tools for >> > denugging, >> > client/server-side automatic-transpiling, bundled up in >> > minification/compression algorythms, etc... >> > >> > It's a cool idea, and pyjammas has existed for a long time now, but is >> > anyone seriously thinking about using that in production? >> > >> > I think as long as browsers don't have some kind of cross-language VMs, >> > or >> > at least a PVM built-in/plugin, than with all the excitement, it will >> > remain >> > useless. >> > I mean, how do you debug this? >> > >> > -- >> > >> > >> > > > -- > > >
--
