1) ok, i got the book, but 2 resources are better then one, people
explain differently so it will help to have a second source

2.0) love the idea :) exactly my thought ....,
also i would split the docstring into multiple sections:
a) (short) description,
b) explanations of input and output variables (epydoc syntax)
c) unit-tests

2.1) i would extend the docstring wiki by an example/comments part
below the wiki page that will not be merged with the code because e.g.
a validator would be hard to understand with just a docstring

On Feb 5, 6:04 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
> > > 2) integrate the above with a small web2py app that turns web2py
> > > docstrings into wiki pages. When users edit the wiki, the docstrings
> > > get updated, and I get a patch.
>
> > Interesting thought. I'm slightly skeptical (about editing docstrings 
> > outside the context of the source code itself, and about doctests), but at 
> > the very least the underlying goal is great: a way to quickly edit 
> > docstrings without going through a formal patch process.
>
> The way it would work is that a program moves docstring from gluon to
> wiki. People edit the wiki with versioning. I can review them and have
> a mechanism to automatically put them back.
>
> I yet do not know how to implement the last step. It would help if I
> could find example of code that automatically replaces some text ('a'-
>
>
>
> >'b') inside all docstrings. It would help me build the app.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.

Reply via email to