> LOL. That ambiguous phrasing may be enough to tip Graham Dumpleton > over the edge!
Yes, well, unless I'm using the language of mathematics, I'm not the best of communicator for technical stuff. I apologize. > Others have also spoken enthusiastically about Lighttpd / Nginx in > terms of speed, and a smaller memory footprint too, so try searching > the group. See these for example: Problem is that I'm developing for windows. I don't have anything against Linux, but learning how to use it in most of the gory details (so that I can run a server on it) would be too much of an overhead at this point in time considering the other things I have to pick up (the only thing I'd pick up reasonably quickly are the C system calls). Nginx's window version is beta (http://nginx.org/en/docs/ windows.html). Cherokee's window version is broken (and will be beta for a while once its functional again). Lighttpd doesn't work on Windows. I'm not sure how well IIS works with anything that is not C# or VB for the web framework and I'm not ready to capitulate to C# just yet. I guess I'll try to figure out how to compile Apache on a newish rendition of windows in 64 bits a bit longer. I found some interesting links for that. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
