On 15 oct, 13:32, Mark Breedveld <m.breedv...@solcon.nl> wrote: > You have the idea. Thanks for clearing it towards the others. > > My guesses it we need to do both. > Because Jose goal is general purpose and mine aswell, > but comes with overkill in the most cases. > > In Jose case I would suggest a slight change. > web2py-core > web2py-gluon > > This has been discusses before, I recall you where in those > discussions > Jose.http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_frm/thread/45ea4327d713b... > > http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_frm/thread/51b731d9abb52... > > There are some other topics, search for turnkeylinux, where this is > mentioned. > > I recall Dimo Barsky was busy with packaging Gluon, but I've been out > for a while. > I don't know him, but he might help with this. > > It was chaos post again, but I hope this one helps:p. > > Mark,
Thanks, but after looking for more info in the links you provided, I have not been able to find the rationale for a separate gluon and core packages. can anybody enlight me?
