On 2012-03-28, at 11:23 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
>
> On Mar 28, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Farrukh Ijaz wrote:
>
>>> return contentDisposition != null && (contentDisposition.indexOf("inline")
>>> > -1 || contentDisposition.indexOf("attachment") > -1);
>>>
>>> Seriously, who can read that and make sense of it immediately?!
>>
>> This is programmers shorthand. They master it with time. If you find these
>> statements somewhere in the code, consider that piece of code been written
>> by an experienced programmer which is less likely to have bugs. This is
>> style is still not difficult than what you can find in a TopCoder algorithm
>> which contains is full of boolean and bit manipulation operators.
>
>
> I have to _vehemently_ disagree. One way many people learn how to be good
> coders it by looking at other people's code and being able to see what it
> does. Not only that, but the assumption that it's less likely to have bugs
> because it is obtuse?! Are you serious?
You've the freedom agree or disagree but not _vehemently_. Everyone should
respect other's opinion and so do I with respectfully. One must learn the
language syntax. Why should I use such a verbosity in code when it's already
easy to understand.
int max = (x > y) ? x : y;
is much better in readability than:
int max = 0;
if (x > y) {
max = x;
} else {
max = y;
}
>
> This is one of the most elitist things I've heard said on the WO-dev list.
If this is so bad practice then why Project Coin introduces Strings in
switches, developer can still do if-elseif-elseif-elseif...else coding. This is
in fact elite coding style :) Following is excerpt for String.java
public boolean equalsIgnoreCase(String s)
{
return this != s ? s != null && s.count == count && regionMatches(true,
0, s, 0, count) : true;
}
We really shouldn't go into coding convention domain. I respect everyone's
style and we should try to learn the best practices. Trust me verbosity is good
for examples but in practice, we should compact our code as much as we can.
Thanks,
Farrukh
>
> Dave
>
> —————————————————————————————
> WebObjects - so easy that even Dave Avendasora can do it!™
> —————————————————————————————
> David Avendasora
> Senior Software Abuser
> Kaiten, Inc.
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
