On Apr 1, 2009, at 5:48 PM, John Plocher wrote:
The perception out here in the community was that y'all had had that above conversation privately among yourselves, and had come to a conclusion without talking to the rest of us - in other words, a perceived lack of transparency in your decision making process.
Well, people often perceive mail is 'broken' when they haven't bothered to subscribe to a list or configure their mail filters, too.
There was no conversation, just a lot of rabid rumour mongering out on the website which really didn't serve much purpose.
/This/ discussion, on the other hand, is happening in public, and one of the community leaders is trying to get things fixed so that he can better lead the communities he is contributing to. All you need to do is check the C&CC lists for those communities, find Garrett's name on them, and send mail to the existing list owners asking if they have any objections to adding Garrett as a moderator. Knowing Glynn Foster, Alan Duboff and Yunsong (Roamer) Lu, I can't think that they would have *any* problem adding Garrett to the ranks of email helpers.
Well, fine, they own the lists, let them add him in. As I've said, it's really not my problem at this point since my job ends at the configuration line. The lists are functioning according to their respective configurations.
e. _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
