On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 14:25 -0400, Sebastien Roy wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 14:19 -0400, Elaine Ashton wrote: > > Filtering spam is likely one of the better points of the software we > > have on hand as between the postfix rbls and the spamassassin rule > > sets, we punt about 60-95% of all mail coming at the system on any > > given day. The thing is that user/subscriber/whitelist management > > across 300+ lists is not something simply done in the current model > > and wildcards leave holes the size of small countries through which > > anyone with sendmail and a little, a very little, knowledge could > > drive anything they wanted through. I'd be happy to demonstrate this > > for anyone who doubts how easily mail can be spoofed. > > Ah, that's the part I didn't understand. I didn't realize that you > already use postfix/spamassassin, and that was still not adequate. > Thanks for explaining.
On a related note, I apologize that my mail to you and Alan came across as counter-productive and confrontational. I'll try to keep in mind that your team is very resource constrained, and that it's really easy for us on the sidelines to build bike-sheds. :-) -Seb _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
