Alan Burlison wrote: > Roland Mainz wrote: > > Will anything be done on the performance and usabilty issues of the > > XWiki ? Last time I tried it was _impossible_ to upload more complex > > HTML documents (which make the bulk of the ksh93-integration and shell > > project documentation) and even plain navigation using Seamonkey or > > Opera was slow as molasses. > > That's nothing to do per se with Auth,
I know... but it renders the site useless for _me_ (as project lead) since I cannot upload my pages. That's one of the reasons why I am more and more unhappy with the choice of a Wiki as main webpage engine (mozilla.org had a similar experiment which they aborted (I can only be described as catastrophy since the engine neither scaled nor was it resistant to DOS attacks) after _one_ day and right now I see the same happen again for OpenSolaris.org (yes yes, right now it's not in the final state and I shouldn't complain about work-in-progress... but somehow it feels like "repeated history" for me)). As said on IRC I would prefer a simpler system consisting out of a Subversion tree for main and project pages (mozilla.org, mozdev.org etc. use this scheme for their webpages) and run the wiki as http://wiki.opensolaris.org/. > but if you can provide some more > details and examples we'll look into it. Please try to _upload_ the attached HTML file ("opensolaris_shell_styleguide.html.bz2"). All my attempts either took several _hours_ or caused the browser to run out of memory. ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [email protected] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;)
opensolaris_shell_styleguide.html.bz2
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
