Jim Grisanzio wrote:
"o A Contributor: Anyone explicitly recognized by the Leaders of a
Group as having substantially helped with the goals of a that Group.
[A Contributor may be given additional rights and responsibilities,
for example, to edit web pages, commit code to source repositories,
help moderate associated mailing lists, etc]
."
That's the only place that web site is mentioned.
That sentence articulates an implementation concept, not an assignment
of constitutional rights. It's an example. The OGB discussed this during
the constitutional drafting process. The new constitution was designed
to specifically define a small set of core roles, and it was intended
that the apps running on the site would assign rights to those roles.
That's what resulted from the last OGB term.
Thanks Jim. I would still like it removed, and will work toward that
this term. I don't think website implementation needs to be part of the
OpenSolaris Constitution even if it is only mentioned in an example.
Cheers,
Jim
_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
