On Sun, 19 Jul 2009, Peter Tribble wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Alan Burlison<[email protected]> wrote:
John Plocher wrote:
The existing website app ties webpage editing rights to a "leader"
roll that is in no way connected to either the Core Contributor
governance role or the Contributor constitutional one. Please don't
try to rewrite history...
That misfeature that has long been the source of complaint, that the current
portal does not reflect the Constitution. That is one of the things we are
rectifying.
The problem is that there's a "Leaders" link that is broken; it ought to
say "Editors" (an accurate description) or be recast to return the Core
Contributor list.
That is my understanding as well. People didn't like that it was labled
"Leaders"
as opposed to something like "editors". I don't recall anyone asking for
it to be tied to the constitution.
Again, I did not see follow up to this part of the thread, so I'm hoping
to get more information on it now.
Valerie
--
Valerie Fenwick, http://blogs.sun.com/bubbva/ @bubbva
Solaris Security Technologies, Developer, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
17 Network Circle, Menlo Park, CA, 94025.
_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
