> > 
> > On 28/10/2009, at 6:20 AM, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > 
> > > * andrew <[email protected]> [2009-10-27
> > 01:56]:
> > >> I can't find a couple of navbar items that
> existed
> > on the old  
> > >> website.
> > >> Can someone point to where the "blogs" and
> > "planet" options have  
> > >> moved
> > >> to?
> > >
> > >  I don't believe the XWiki site has the (weird)
> > blog capture and
> > >  aggregation function of the old site.  Steven
> > already mentioned
> > >
> > >  http://planet.opensolaris.org
> > 
> > FWIW, I've been doing a terrible job at maintaining
>  
>  planet.opensolaris.org lately. If anyone would like
>  to take it over,  
> I'd be happy to stand down - it does need to be a
>  Sun
>  employee to be  
>  able to access the site infrastructure. The only
>  caveat I have is  
>  maintaining the quality of the blog posts and
>  ensuring that the people  
>  actively contributing to OpenSolaris are included -
>  using the OS alone  
>  isn't sufficient in my book.
> 
> It looks fine to me - the only thing I would say is
> that if the old blogs page
> (www.opensolaris.org/os/blogs) is being retired then
> it would be good to have all of the blogs that were
> on this page provided on planet as well - the two
> seem to have slightly different lists. I prefer
> reading blogs on planet so the fact the old one has
> gone away isn't a problem for me, as long as it
> includes all the blogs the old blogs page did.
> 
> I also don't think it is a good idea to have a
> seperate subsites page that isn't part of the site
> map. This creates unnecessary duplication for no
> obvious benefit, in my view. It's just another page
> that is likely to get out of date , whereas the site
> map is maintained automatically.

Oops - I made a mistake there. The site map page isn't updated automatically. I 
do think having 2 pages that have basically the same content is a bad idea.

Cheers

Andrew.
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to