C. Bergström wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Mark Martin wrote:
The resources that "Sun provides the community" as in the charter are
arguably serving the community needs less and less as time progresses.
 The "community" is *clearly* not a stakeholder in determining the
changes that the website team provides.

I'm sorry, but that just isn't true. The whole process of selecting xwiki, etc. was very open. I saw no significant pushback (as a whole) over the HTML issues and so on.

bs.. I raised the objection we should have stayed update to the latest version of Jive software clearspace community and the whole migration process would have been much easier.

Note I said *as a whole*. I saw one or two people. The majority of users were satisfied. I certainly was.

I saw no significant objection to that except it wasn't open source.

Which is a very good reason to not use it.

Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to