Yes the best method when using the Interceptor is to use the Customized 
server settings. The path doesn't matter. But in some firmware versions it 
just couldn't be left blank or it wouldn't send. So just put in index.php? 
for the path.


On Saturday, January 16, 2021 at 3:49:17 PM UTC-5 sjr4...@gmail.com wrote:

> OK. So i am homing in a little closer here. 
> I have configured the console to wunderground and it is working. 
>
> Now i need to adjust weewx.conf with the following, but as the weewx 
> server is on a different subnet, i will need to use listen mode. 
>
> [Interceptor]
> driver = user.interceptor
> device_type = wu-client 
>
> If i understand, i can point the console with a custom config to my 
> server, and then publish from my server to wunderground right?
>
> if i do that, what will the path on weewx for the console? 
>
> host:      weewx.local.lan
> Path:     ?
> ID:           xxxxxx
> Key:        xxxxxx
>
> also, on a side note. I can't find the log in freebsd. 
>
> On Saturday, January 16, 2021 at 9:17:02 PM UTC+1 galfert wrote:
>
>> What I understand you are saying is that you have a WH2910 and you want 
>> to interface it with WeeWX. Since you don't have an Ambient version you do 
>> have the ability to easily use the Interceptor driver. Ambient WS-2902 
>> can't without a lot of extra work. You, with the WH2910 can simply install 
>> the WeeWX Interceptor driver and make sure your WeeWX config is set to use 
>> the Interceptor driver with the correct WU client settings:
>> [Interceptor]
>> driver = user.interceptor
>> device_type = wu-client  
>>
>> ...or you can add the Ecowitt GW1000 driver and the instead use the 
>> GW1000 API driver instead of the Interceptor driver. This will allow you to 
>> add more sensors.
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, January 16, 2021 at 2:54:09 PM UTC-5 sjr4...@gmail.com 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> actually, mine is equivalent to the WH2910 - it is not a case of 
>>> getting, i already have
>>> On Saturday, January 16, 2021 at 4:42:53 PM UTC+1 galfert wrote:
>>>
>>>> You have dug up quite an old thread. A lot has changed since. The 
>>>> recommendation now is to just acquire the Ecowitt GW1000 and use the WeeWX 
>>>> GW1000 API driver. The GW1000 will directly pick up your sensor data (it 
>>>> doesn't talk to the display console...as it is its own console). You'll 
>>>> get 
>>>> a much nicer experience with the GW1000, which will also let you add extra 
>>>> sensors.
>>>> https://github.com/gjr80/weewx-gw1000
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, January 16, 2021 at 2:43:44 AM UTC-5 sjr4...@gmail.com 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> were you able to get this to work in the end. can you share the weewx 
>>>>> details please
>>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, April 1, 2017 at 4:37:01 PM UTC+2 44085w...@gmail.com 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I see that weewx is said to support the FINE OFFSET WH2900 , I was 
>>>>>> wondering if anyone could share with me the protocol and port 
>>>>>> information 
>>>>>> that is in the driver? I
>>>>>>
>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/9ffc8d40-0683-439b-99ae-177157df776cn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to