On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 07:59:55PM +0100, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Sunday 22 February 2009, Mark de Wever wrote: > ... > > * Cmake; mog implemented the cmake build system and went MIA afterwards, > > which means cmake has no real maintainer. It seems to work mostly but is > > in need of some love. > > At FOSDEM there were at least two Wesnoth developers who really prefer > cmake :-)
I know I'm one of those two ;-) As said that's the current status, but like I said later in that mail I want to start to maintain cmake. > ... > > Cmake also supports to make project files for MSVC > > The MSVC and XCode projects should be, how to put it, "full quality", i.e. > both are used by the developers at Kitware themselves all the time for > working on the projects they earn their money with. I know MSVC should be good quality I use cmake and MSVC myself in another project. But we have quite some custom scripts in cmake/ and I've no idea how well tested they are on MSVC. (We still need to evaluate which of those scripts are really needed after moving to cmake 2.6.) At some places we still use shell scripts inherited from the autotools build system, which of course is not portable at all. I'm only not sure whether these scripts are really needed to build the system or only used by the translation and the release manager. But I'll dive deeper into these issues later. -- Regards, Mark de Wever aka Mordante/SkeletonCrew _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list Wesnoth-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
