Thanks, Andrea. We're going to play around with citation analysis from ACM 
Digital Library, since it's better structured than Google Scholar (though, of 
course, it doesn't have nearly as many citations). I'll send an update when 
we've got something.

~ Chitu


-------- Message original --------
Sujet: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Wikipedia literature review - include or exclude 
conference articles
De : Andrea Forte <andrea.fo...@gmail.com>
Pour : Research into Wikimedia content and communities 
<wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Date : March-22-11 4:19:15 PM
Chitu - these are not machine-generated results. :) It's the work of a human!

I searched for "wikipedia" and "wikipedian" in google scholar and rejected the 
ones that I felt were not actually *about* wikipedia itself, then I searched for fernanda's paper 
because I know it is one of the top cited papers about wikipedia (note that it does NOT have 
wikipedia in the title) to come up with a set of 10-15 readings that our team could all start with.

Andrea


On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Chitu Okoli <chitu.ok...@concordia.ca 
<mailto:chitu.ok...@concordia.ca>> wrote:

    Hi Andrea,

    I can see from yours and others' comments that conference ranking sites are 
not that helpful (to put it mildly). I'll respond to the matter of the shared 
bibliography in the separate thread on that topic.

    I'm leaning towards exploring citation counts more. How did you get the 
counts you gave from Google Scholar? Could you give us your exact search 
keywords? I couldn't reproduce what you gave us; perhaps I don't know how to 
use Google Scholar that flexibly.

    One useful tool for citation analysis with Google Scholar is Harzing's Publish or 
Perish (freeware, not free software): http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm. By doing a simple 
search on "Wikipedia" in the General Citations keywords, I got the following as 
the top ten results:

    Cites       Authors         Title   Year    Source  ArticleURL
    913         J Giles         Internet encyclopaedias go head to head         2005    
Nature  
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v438/n7070/full/438900a.html?&$NMW_TRANS$=ext 
<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v438/n7070/full/438900a.html?&$NMW_TRANS$=ext>
    385         E Gabrilovich…  Computing semantic relatedness using 
wikipedia-based explicit semantic analysis         2007    Proceedings of the 
20th International Joint …   
http://www.aaai.org/Papers/IJCAI/2007/IJCAI07-259.pdf
    358         M Völkel, M Krötzsch, D Vrandecic…      Semantic wikipedia      
2006    Proceedings of the …    http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1135863
    281         L Denoyer…      The wikipedia xml corpus        2006    ACM 
SIGIR Forum         http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1147210
    260         A Bruns         Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From 
production to produsage         2008    
        
    228         M Strube…       WikiRelate! Computing semantic relatedness 
using Wikipedia      2006    Proceedings of the National Conference on …     
http://www.aaai.org/Papers/AAAI/2006/AAAI06-223.pdf
    201         A Lih   Wikipedia as participatory journalism: Reliable 
sources? metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource  2003    
Nature  
    197         J Voss  Measuring wikipedia     2005    International 
Conference of the International Society for …     
http://eprints.rclis.org/handle/10760/6207
    161         SP Ponzetto…    Deriving a large scale taxonomy from Wikipedia  
2007    Proceedings of the national conference on …     
http://scholar.google.comhttps://www.aaai.org/Papers/AAAI/2007/AAAI07-228.pdf
    158         BT Adler…       A content-driven reputation system for the 
Wikipedia    2007    … of the 16th international conference on …     
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1242608


    These are pretty different from your results. Could you tell me how you got 
yours?

    Thanks,
    Chitu


    -------- Message original --------
    Sujet: [Wiki-research-l] Wikipedia literature review - include or exclude 
conference articles
    De : Andrea Forte <andrea.fo...@gmail.com> <mailto:andrea.fo...@gmail.com>

    Pour : Research into Wikimedia content and communities
    <wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org> 
<mailto:wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
    Date : 18/03/2011 9:33 AM
    Hi all, after following these links:

    * Top Tier and 2nd tier conferences from
    http://webdocs.cs.ualberta.ca/~zaiane/htmldocs/ConfRanking.html  
<http://webdocs.cs.ualberta.ca/%7Ezaiane/htmldocs/ConfRanking.html>
    * A-ranked conferences in Information and Computing Sciences from
    http://lamp.infosys.deakin.edu.au/era/?pageÏorsel10  
<http://lamp.infosys.deakin.edu.au/era/?page%CForsel10>
    I discovered that CHI is not a top-tier HCI conference. Or even 2nd or 3rd. :) 
Neither is CSCW, Group, etc. (For those not in CS/HCI, CHI is *the* top tier conference 
with acceptance rates lower than most journals in the area and the others I listed are 
nearly as competitive. And venues like WikiSym that have higher acceptance rates attract 
top-tier work as well - many papers of equivalent quality have been published there.) 
So... I would suggest that, to review the Wikipedia literature, you need to choose a 
field (or set of fields) you know and become deeply knowledgeable about the literature in 
that field by reading it and following citations, etc. Searching for every paper ever 
written that mentions "Wikipedia" in the title/abstract will catch you lots of 
peripheral work that is not *about* Wikipedia, but that uses Wikipedia as a context for 
studying something else. Machines aren't good at literature reviews. :) That said, it 
would be incredibly useful to have a
    common repository of citations that can be annotated, discussed etc. Reid 
Priedhorsky, Phoebe Ayers, Brent Hecht, Darren Gergle, and Mako Hill and I have 
been talking about doing a literature review as well and have come to the 
conclusions that A) there's too much to cover in just one paper and B) a place 
to collaboratively assemble knowledge about the literature is a prerequisite 
for such an endeavor. We were thinking a MediaWiki with templates to structure 
citation data for export would be better than any of the bib software out 
there. But actually... I remember reading that Tiki Wiki now explicitly 
supports citation, I think? The bottom line is, B) Is something this community 
could really do a great job of developing and it would be mutually beneficial. 
No one of us is going to cover all the Wikipedia literature alone, unless we 
make it a full time job. :) FYI, we chose Travis's citation filtering method as 
a starting point and came up with the list below as our
    common starter reading list and planned to divy things up from there. Andrea =Top 
Citations in Goog Scholar == * '''449 cites''' Fernanda B. Viegas, Martin Wattenberg, 
and Kushal Dave. 2004. [http://alumni.media.mit.edu/~fviegas/papers/history_flow.pdf 
<http://alumni.media.mit.edu/%7Efviegas/papers/history_flow.pdf> Studying 
cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations]. In 
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '04). 
ACM, New York, NY, USA, 575-582. * '''288 cites''' Bryant, Susan, Andrea Forte and 
Amy Bruckman. (2005). 
[http://www.andreaforte.net/BryantForteBruckBecomingWikipedian.pdf Becoming 
Wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia]. 
Proceedings of GROUP International Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel 
Island, FL, pp. 1-10. ** recent counterpoint: Katherine Panciera, Aaron Halfaker, and 
Loren Terveen. 2009.
    [http://www.grouplens.org/system/files/Group09WikipediansPanciera.pdf 
Wikipedians are born, not made: a study of power editors on Wikipedia]. In 
Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work 
(GROUP '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 51-60. * '''193 cites''' Voß, J. 
[http://hapticity.net/pdf/nime2006_180-works_cited/MeasuringWikipedia2005.pdf

    Measuring Wikipedia]. Proceedings of 10th International Conference of
    the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics,
    (Stockholm, Sweden), 2005.

    * '''187 cites''' Lih, A.
    [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi .1.1.117.9104&rep=rep1&type=pdf  
<http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi+.1.1.117.9104&rep=rep1&type=pdf>
    Wikipedia as Participatory journalism: reliable sources? metrics for
    evaluating collaborative media as a news resource]. Proceedings of
    Fifth International Symposium on Online Journalism, April 16-17, 2004,
    (Austin, TX), 2004.

    * '''145 cites''' Fernanda B. Viegas, Martin Wattenberg, Jesse Kriss,
    Frank van Ham, [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi 
.1.1.84.6907&rep=rep1&type=pdf  
<http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi+.1.1.84.6907&rep=rep1&type=pdf>
    Talk Before You Type: Coordination in Wikipedia] hicss, pp.78a, 40th
    Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07),
    2007

    * '''140 cites''' Kittur, A.; Chi, E. H. ; Pendleton, B. A. ; Suh, B.
    ; Mytkowicz, T. Power of the few vs. wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia
    and the rise of the bourgeoisie. Alt.CHI at CHI 2007; 2007 April 28 -
    May 3; San Jose, CA.

    * '''138 cites''' Aniket Kittur, Bongwon Suh, Bryan A. Pendleton, and
    Ed H. Chi. 2007. He says, she says: conflict and coordination in
    Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in
    computing systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 453-462. '

    * '''101 cites''' Reid Priedhorsky, Jilin Chen, Shyong (Tony) K. Lam,
    Katherine Panciera, Loren Terveen, and John Riedl. 2007.
    [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi .1.1.123.7456&rep=rep1&type=pdf  
<http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi+.1.1.123.7456&rep=rep1&type=pdf>
    Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia]. In Proceedings of 
the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work (GROUP '07). 
ACM, New York, NY, USA, 259-268. =Other Significant Papers == * '''Best Paper 
Award''' Ivan Beschastnikh, Travis Kriplean and David W. McDonald 
[http://www.aaai.org/Papers/ICWSM/2008/ICWSM08-011.pdf Wikipedian 
Self-Governance in Action: Motivating the Policy Lens]International Conference 
on Weblogs and Social Media, 2008. * '''Honorable Mention''' Travis Kriplean, 
Ivan Beschastnikh and David W. McDonald 
[http://dub.washington.edu/djangosite/media/papers/tmpZ77p1r.pdf Articulations 
of WikiWork: Uncovering Valued Work in Wikipedia through Barnstars] Computer 
Supported Cooperative Work, 2008. =Relevant Scholarly Books == Reagle's book, 
Lih's book, Sunstein, Benkler




--
 :: Andrea Forte
 :: Assistant Professor
 :: College of Information Science and Technology, Drexel University
 :: http://www.andreaforte.net


_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to