On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 6:54 PM, rupert THURNER <rupert.thur...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> would it make sense to use wikidata for such tasks as well?
>
>
Wikidata already represents more granular information than an article, the
real problem is that the only way that we have to bind a piece of
information in Wikipedia to its Wikidata representation is through the
article name.
This is of course derived from the technological limitations of mediawiki
which treats each article as a blob of text.

On Wikisource we use Labeled Section Transclusion to define regions of a
mediawiki page that can be transcluded into other pages:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Labeled_Section_Transclusion

It is normally used with the following format:

## stable_section_identifier ##
some text here
####

In a way, it is like creating a local variable, since you assign an
identifier to a section that later on can be referred to regardless of the
changes in the text or in the title. I wonder if this is something that
could be adapted for Wikipedia in a way that users could mark article
sections with unique identifiers and then link those stable section
identifiers in Wikidata.

Cheers,
Micru
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

Reply via email to