Absolutely, I don't want to push anything under the rug. I'll put a section
in there for issues and what the Wikidata community is planning to do about
them.

On 24 September 2017 at 01:00, James Heald <j.he...@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:

> Equally, the page may usefully serve to inform contributors to Wikidata
> about legitimate concerns from other projects that have arisen out of test
> integrations, that there is a need to do more to address.
>
>   -- James.
>
>
>
> On 23/09/2017 22:18, john cummings wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I'm putting aside time next week to write up an information page on
>> Wikidata for contributors to other Wikimedia projects who want to know
>> more
>> about/may have concerns about reusing Wikidata on other projects. I hope
>> this will help people having the same discussions over and over and allay
>> many of the concerns of users from other projects.
>>
>> I'm starting off with a list of common arguments for not using data from
>> Wikidata and working my way back from there, please do take a look and
>> brain dump
>>
>> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:John_Cummings/Wikidata_in
>> _Wikimedia_projects
>>
>> Thanks very much
>>
>> John
>>
>> On 23 September 2017 at 14:34, James Heald <j.he...@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>> It's not just other wikis where cryptic template invocations can be an
>>> issue.
>>>
>>> I sometimes think that on Wikidata itself, with templates {{P|...}} and
>>> {{Q|...}}, we could use a bot to add the label of the property or item in
>>> the default language of the page as an extra parameter to the template.
>>>
>>> (If I remember correctly, both the P and Q templates permit the presence
>>> of such a extra, undisplayed parameter).
>>>
>>> For one thing, this would make discussions significantly easier to
>>> interpret for anyone who is following the diffs as raw wikitext.
>>>
>>> It also might help with people arguing at cross-purposes, basing their
>>> arguments on the label of a property or item in their own language, which
>>> is what is visible to them because it is their language labels that the
>>> {{P|...}} and {{Q|...}} templates show them -- but may be different to
>>> what
>>> the {{P|...}} and {{Q|...}} templates show to other participants who
>>> have a
>>> different mother tongue.  Often both sides think their arguments are
>>> right
>>> and obvious, based on the different native labels that the P and Q
>>> templates are showing them.  If there was a label added in a single
>>> language, even if displayed only in the wikitext of the page, they might
>>> sometimes realise this sooner.
>>>
>>> So, for both of these reasons, I think there can be a case for
>>> human-meaningful "explanatory" or "identificatory" parameter-slots in
>>> templates, even if they are never displayed in actual page-output.
>>>
>>> A bot-added Harvardesque-ref courtesy field in {{Cite_Q}} could be
>>> exactly
>>> another such example.
>>>
>>>    -- James.
>>>
>>> On 23/09/2017 05:50, LeadSongDog wrote:
>>>
>>> My point, Andy, was that some parameters can be required, such as CS1
>>>> requiring the parameter Title. Further, the Ref parameter can be
>>>> automated,
>>>> as with ref=harv.
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 22, 2017, at 5:09 PM, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk>
>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 22 September 2017 at 01:45, LeadSongDog <leads...@webname.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not "enforcing", but it's certainly possible to show an error message
>>>>>> for missing parameters. Many other cite templates do so.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> The subject under discussion was "a legible refname"; that's not a
>>>>> parameter of the template and no cite templates currently warn if a
>>>>> refname is missing, let alone not "legible".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to