DBpedia actually has no data, we provide tools to more effectively use OTHER
PEOPLE'S DATA, e.g. Wikipedia.
Here is an image of the maximum size of the new scalable and actually bulk
downloadable DBpedia via Databus in let's say one or two years:
https://lod-cloud.net/
With Download As Wikidata Q's and P's Option.
It's there, just hard to download in bulk.
LG,
Sebastian
On September 22, 2019 10:41:10 AM GMT+02:00, Markus Kroetzsch
<markus.kroetz...@tu-dresden.de> wrote:
>On 22/09/2019 08:48, Sebastian Hellmann wrote:
>...
>>
>> The formula here is quite easy: If you look at DBpedia's data in
>detail
>> or a part of it, it will not shine so much since it is extracted,
>
>Sure, but I think that this is not clear to many people who are
>currently using DBpedia as a dataset (even if only for testing/research
>
>purposes). Also, there would surely be value in analysing the
>differences more closely. I agree with you that quantitatively,
>Wikidata
>might be orders of magnitudes ahead. Yet, there can still be individual
>
>bits of information that are in DBpedia but missing from Wikidata so
>far.
>
>For example, DBpedia EN has 32 people educated at the University of
>Leipzig, whereas Wikidata has 1217. Nevertheless, there is, for
>example,
>John Henry Wright (Q6238997), who is known to DBpedia but not to
>Wikidata (yet). Such cases might be worth systematic weeding out so
>that
>we can really come to the point where Wikidata is a strict superset of
>all (correct) data in DBpedia.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Markus
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
