Anil,

Anil,

I'd suggest you focus on one module and we get it to the point where
it can be a featured learning resource.

I see the whole MHRM as a featured project;
http://wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Quality_Assurance_and_Review/Featured_project
And if you read over the criteria for a featured project, all the
modules need to meet the featured resource criteria...

Choose a module and lets have it reviewed as a featured learning
resource. If we get one of the MHRM modules through, then we can work
on all the modules. Then if all goes well the MHRM project could also
become the featured project... I love social media and the wiki way...
Go Anil Go!

Let me know how I can help.

Sincerely,

Peter

On Nov 25, 5:51 am, Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Peter,
>
> I have commenced the works. Today I have added a navigation template
> for Topic 1 as seen 
> athttp://www.wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework/Professional_Educ...
>
> Before approaching the community to volunteer validating, I would like
> to get one clarification. As a whole course MHRM project requires a
> lot more work. However we can get the individual Sections gone through
> the validating process - this is one option. Or we may get the
> proposed framework as available on the 
> pagehttp://www.wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework/Professional_Educ....
> If we can finalize it today I can concentrate on some content addition/
> revision works in the coming two or three days.
>
> Warm regards
> Anil
>
> On Nov 25, 12:22 am, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Anil,
>
> > This is fantastic. I'd really like to have a resource go through the
> > featured criteria... I believe this will make the criteria stronger...
> > as we are willing to accept feedback on the criteria and make changes
> > for improvement.
> > The process of becoming featured also requires two reviewers, see item
> > 2;http://wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Quality_Assurance_and_Review/Fea...
> > "2. Nominees must identify two independent reviewers who are willing
> > to review the content validity of the resource and publish their names
> > as reviewers of the content"
>
> > If you cannot find reviewers maybe we could sent a request out to the
> > community...
>
> > Cheers,
>
> > Peter
>
> > On Nov 24, 1:50 am, Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Hi Peter,
>
> > > It is great!
>
> > > I would like 
> > > nominatehttp://www.wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework/Professional_Educ...
>
> > > Warm regards
> > > Anil
>
> > > On Nov 24, 9:51 am, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Hello All,
>
> > > > I while back we started to develop the Quality Assurance and Review
> > > > process for WikiEducator. A fair bit of time was spent in putting
> > > > together the Quality Assurance 
> > > > Framework;http://wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Quality_Assurance_Frameworkand
> > > > the related featured works specifications. This portal is not finished
> > > > but some important parts are getting close. Feel free to navigate this
> > > > portal to see what has been built so far.
>
> > > > What I would like is to test out the Featured learning 
> > > > resource;http://wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Quality_Assurance_and_Review/Fea...
> > > > I believe we have enough here to see if a resource can make it through
> > > > the criteria.
>
> > > > Any volunteers willing to engage this opportunity, nominate their
> > > > resource and assist us in improving our Quality Assurance Framework?
> > > > And also improve the quality of their resource as we iterate toward it
> > > > becoming the featured work.
>
> > > > Sincerely, Peter- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "WikiEducator" group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to wikieducator@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to