Anil, 1) May I suggest you review the Featured Learning Resource criteria as you develop materials. This way you may be closer when it comes to review. Remember you can make changes to the criteria if you think it would make them better and more appropriate given OER development realities. 2) The Quality Assurance Framework also requests you nominate two reviewers... Given the graduate level of this module, finding a knowledgable reviewer is important. I believe you would be the best to determine who would be a good reviewer. We could of course put this request out to the community...
http://wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Quality_Assurance_and_Review/Featured_learning_resource Cheers, Peter On Nov 26, 8:30 am, Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Peter, > > I have commenced the count down. The first module of the MHRM Course, > “Principles of Management" with its 10 sections available > athttp://wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework/Professional_Educatio... > will be ready to be fired from the Section 1<smile> from 16:00, 01 > December 2008 (UTC) . > > Please give out the request to the WE community for voluntary > validating > > Warm regards > Anil > > On Nov 25, 8:09 pm, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Anil, > > > Anil, > > > I'd suggest you focus on one module and we get it to the point where > > it can be a featured learning resource. > > > I see the whole MHRM as a featured > > project;http://wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Quality_Assurance_and_Review/Fea... > > And if you read over the criteria for a featured project, all the > > modules need to meet the featured resource criteria... > > > Choose a module and lets have it reviewed as a featured learning > > resource. If we get one of the MHRM modules through, then we can work > > on all the modules. Then if all goes well the MHRM project could also > > become the featured project... I love social media and the wiki way... > > Go Anil Go! > > > Let me know how I can help. > > > Sincerely, > > > Peter > > > On Nov 25, 5:51 am, Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Dear Peter, > > > > I have commenced the works. Today I have added a navigation template > > > for Topic 1 as seen > > > athttp://www.wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework/Professional_Educ... > > > > Before approaching the community to volunteer validating, I would like > > > to get one clarification. As a whole course MHRM project requires a > > > lot more work. However we can get the individual Sections gone through > > > the validating process - this is one option. Or we may get the > > > proposed framework as available on the > > > pagehttp://www.wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework/Professional_Educ.... > > > If we can finalize it today I can concentrate on some content addition/ > > > revision works in the coming two or three days. > > > > Warm regards > > > Anil > > > > On Nov 25, 12:22 am, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Anil, > > > > > This is fantastic. I'd really like to have a resource go through the > > > > featured criteria... I believe this will make the criteria stronger... > > > > as we are willing to accept feedback on the criteria and make changes > > > > for improvement. > > > > The process of becoming featured also requires two reviewers, see item > > > > 2;http://wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Quality_Assurance_and_Review/Fea... > > > > "2. Nominees must identify two independent reviewers who are willing > > > > to review the content validity of the resource and publish their names > > > > as reviewers of the content" > > > > > If you cannot find reviewers maybe we could sent a request out to the > > > > community... > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Peter > > > > > On Nov 24, 1:50 am, Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > > > It is great! > > > > > > I would like > > > > > nominatehttp://www.wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework/Professional_Educ... > > > > > > Warm regards > > > > > Anil > > > > > > On Nov 24, 9:51 am, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > I while back we started to develop the Quality Assurance and Review > > > > > > process for WikiEducator. A fair bit of time was spent in putting > > > > > > together the Quality Assurance > > > > > > Framework;http://wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Quality_Assurance_Frameworkand > > > > > > the related featured works specifications. This portal is not > > > > > > finished > > > > > > but some important parts are getting close. Feel free to navigate > > > > > > this > > > > > > portal to see what has been built so far. > > > > > > > What I would like is to test out the Featured learning > > > > > > resource;http://wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Quality_Assurance_and_Review/Fea... > > > > > > I believe we have enough here to see if a resource can make it > > > > > > through > > > > > > the criteria. > > > > > > > Any volunteers willing to engage this opportunity, nominate their > > > > > > resource and assist us in improving our Quality Assurance Framework? > > > > > > And also improve the quality of their resource as we iterate toward > > > > > > it > > > > > > becoming the featured work. > > > > > > > Sincerely, Peter- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WikiEducator" group. To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator To post to this group, send email to wikieducator@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
