On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Fæ <fae...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/09/2014, Marc A. Pelletier <m...@uberbox.org> wrote: > ... > > metadata. It's not an argument against MV, it's an argument for getting > > rid of the horrid way we handle File: pages with ad-hoc workarounds. > > The *correct* solution is to fix the damn image pages, not to remove MV. > ... > > So, can you link me to a positive proposal to do the elemental > foundation of this, and point to a realistic (and Foundation > supported) proposal to the community to standardize licence templates > on Commons? >
More than that, we should actually have the license data (and other stuff like attribution and descriptions) in a Wikidata-like structure instead of messing with parsing templates at all. The page for that is https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Structured_data. Please do participate in that process. That really should have been done first instead of the CommonsMetadata extension, in my personal opinion. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
