I think all will be clear by Monday. Maybe sooner, but I'm not promising any sooner.
On 3/10/16 12:13 AM, John Mark Vandenberg wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:51 AM, SarahSV <sarahsv.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:42 PM, John Mark Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Are we still waiting for Jimmy to agree/reject to James' request to >>> release an email? >>> >> >> Yes. Jimmy said on 28 February that he wanted to speak to others about >> whether it was okay to release his 30 December 2015 email to James. [1] >> >> There's also the question of releasing the more recent email he sent to >> James and cc-ed to Pete. >> >> James has said nothing needs to be kept confidential for his sake. [2] >> >> Sarah >> >> [1] https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-March/083058.html >> [2] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-February/082815.html > > Jimmy, could you please treat this request with the absolute highest > priority. It has gone on too long. > If some parts must be redacted because you cant get agreement from > other parties, then so be it -- just tell us why (broadly) some part > was redacted. > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
