On 3 August 2012 14:06, Tom Morris <t...@tommorris.org> wrote: >> http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/joint-select/draft-communications-bill/news/call-for-evidence/
> I did put together a list of Wikimedia-specific concerns with the > draft bill a while back on the list. > But everyone pooh-poohed it and told me I'm crazy and paranoid. Oh well. Is this the one where I said "nice one, please write up and submit"? > Also, despite what Andreas says, it's not about partisanship, the bill > is drafted atrociously and extremely vaguely. Even if you agree with > what the government is trying to do, the bill is terribly written and > could lead to absolute absurd and ridiculous conclusions. Seriously, > read the draft bill. If you've used the Internet for more than half an > hour, you'll see why it's insane. Andreas is mainlining Wikipediocracy memes, which are more or less weird dystopic fanfiction from an alternate universe featuring some real names. See recent tl;dr on wikimedia-l, and also keep in mind his most recent service to WMUK. - d. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
